Agree in part - hence the 'tongue in cheek' comment. Their announcements were more of future related and more promisory, rather than actual updates to progress especially financial. If there is an update related to new events then tbe minimal expectation is subsequent reporting as to progress. As Jace pointed out, surely patents that appear to relate to PG relationships are highly relevant and potentially indicated progress in regards to the multiuear agreement and would expect obj to release an update accordingly. After all aren't they obj patents meaning PG cannot control such updates and the patents by definition are in the public realm? Body guard initial anns were all positive and forward looking and then suddenly when receiving annual reports, the info presented appears contrary to expectations - obviously then there were activities in the 12 month interval that could and should be reported rather than the annual reports containing the state of the game at the time leaving holders to then try and fill in the holes as regards progress and activities. From my perspective such updates are sorely missing and merely presenting information at the commencement or conclusion of some event does not constitute updating the market as to progress - they are end points. Also makes voting on performance related motions difficult for holders since usually only have one end point to work from.
OBJ Price at posting:
6.2¢ Sentiment: Hold Disclosure: Held
(20min delay)