Both parties seem to believe they have a right of possession, indeed a God given right, whilst the other (who believe in the same God) think they have been 'gyped'.
The other thinks that the settlers have used their acumen to out-flank them internationally using the tragedy of the Holocaust and perhaps UK financial influence to garner support for a literal interpretation of their God's promise at their expense.
I'd contend that possession isn't even a tenth (tithe) of the law.
