Its hard to tell from your analysis but it appears you have mixed OIP and recoverable factors before taking the 10%, ie a double incidence of the recovery factor. Perhaps I am misunderstanding you.
Micam mentioned the 10% from the AGM which is consistent with the 11% that has previously appeared in their presentations. Solimar, perhaps overly enthusiastically show the 11% and an alternate 25% based on modern recovery methodology.
It will be interesting to see if there is an improvemnt on the 10% given Neons conservative approach pre testing.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- NEN
- paloma deep discovery
paloma deep discovery, page-16
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 17 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)