I see your assumed point, but you have to consider the share structure of the JV and not the ascribed SP/valuation at this stage.
If they each attribute one share each as part of the JV structure (or many times more) which they can do, it means it’s worth on paper 40c. If they make each share $1m, we’ll then two million capitalisation and so on. It’s unlisted but requires a share structure to be described and agreed.
Its not a valuation argument per se, it’s the capital structure component of the JV deal and what sits behind it as an independent valuation (on paper and for the bean counters) and to establish a capital structure basis.
Dont compare the Pirra component of valuation directly to the prevailing SP of CAI, it’s not relevant at this point.
This is neither negative nor positive, just an explanation.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- Panning pic on Twitter
I see your assumed point, but you have to consider the share...
-
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 2 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
CC9
Chariot Corporation (ASX:CC9) refines Black Mountain strategy, launching Pilot Mine to seize U.S. lithium opportunity
NEWS
Breakthrough programs slash healthcare events, driving a significant A$1.8M+ annual revenue boost
Add CAI (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
11.5¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $93.67M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
Featured News
CAI (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable