C'mon Mozz "reasonably received back then", seriously? We are living in the now and the hard truths are that none of the 32+ NDA signees (professionals from Pharma companies that do this for a living) recognised anything in the data room, that would have them want to stump up anything, or recommend to their boards that they should part with a small percentage of their R&D budgets.
In fact, here's what the top 20 R&D spends looked like back in 2022 and none of them decided PAR was worth any of their time or money.Ranked by sales revenue
1 Nett Income 2022
R&D expense 2022
0m as % of R&D
2 #1-Pfizer
$31bn
$12.3bn
0.84%
3 J&J
$21.2bn
$14.6bn
0.68%
4 Roche
$13bn
$15bn
0.66%
5 Merck
$14.5bn
$11.8bn
0.85%
6 Abbvie
$11.7bn
$6.5bn
1.54%
7 Novartis
$6.9bn
$9bn
1.11%
8 Bristol Myers
$6.3bn
$9.4bn
1.06%
9 Sanofi
$8.8bn
$6.7bn
1.5%
10 AstraZenaca
$3.2bn
$9.6bn
1.04%
11 Glaxo
$18bn
$6bn
1.69%
12 #20- BionTech
$9bn
$2bn
5%
13
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- PAR. SP
C'mon Mozz "reasonably received back then", seriously? We are...
Featured News
Add PAR (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
24.5¢ |
Change
0.005(2.08%) |
Mkt cap ! $85.73M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
24.0¢ | 25.0¢ | 23.0¢ | $180.4K | 746.9K |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
4 | 79748 | 24.5¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
25.0¢ | 22818 | 4 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
4 | 79748 | 0.245 |
1 | 8753 | 0.240 |
2 | 110000 | 0.235 |
5 | 36263 | 0.225 |
6 | 72977 | 0.220 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.250 | 22818 | 4 |
0.260 | 39633 | 2 |
0.265 | 8773 | 2 |
0.270 | 106000 | 4 |
0.275 | 23918 | 3 |
Last trade - 16.10pm 14/11/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
PAR (ASX) Chart |