I would say that using a thickness of 15m's is conservative, which is good cause we're speculating here so a possible 450Mt's would certainly heat things up for BMY
But then note if the thickness is doubled to say 30Ms (what I would expect) than the mineralisation doesnt have to have continuity over the entire strike length (also what Id expect) say maybe half, the net result is the same though
I would say that using a thickness of 15m's is conservative,...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 4 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)