patent vs process ip

Patents: Granted to unique discoveries limited 8 to 20 years
http://www.actuateip.com.au/services/what-is-a-patent.html?gclid=CIXmqpvuw6cCFQP1bwodcQoNDg
in other words purchasable at a price
Problems for the patent owner are publishing and claims of infringement such as CSIRO's win about wireless technology.

Process: intangible, proprietary and much better value for MHM long term IMHO.
MHM want to make profit from what they do and they want to develop the technology, so why publish to the world what they do. If and when they have developed the technology to the point where it is earning serious income and someone might duplicate their discoveries in development and they feel it is unique then sure patent it. Until then make income from what they do.

They are making money now and improving and developing their techniques and markets, cement is a really good market there is geelong cement just down the road, if you are interested check out GB vs GP cement and the CO2 impact.

try this link:http://www.ccaa.com.au/events/cmic/Thur_David_Farah.pdf


DYOR
Rg