patently clear facts re gtg !!!, page-5

If the expiry of the patents was publicly known, how did you not know?? You dismissed my post as misleading but now you have checked and admitted my statement was correct.

You talk of misleading information yet you pull a figure of $50m from the air re future licenses. GTG has earned around $60m in license fees on patents that were first granted 20 years ago (and now expired) yet you state they will earn nearly as much again - that is misleading and I am sure it is a number that the Company would baulk at. No doubt you have been talking to Merv with stupid numbers like that. Also bear in mind GTG now have contigency lawyers on hand so to earn $50m you would have to write settlements of probably $100m which makes your statement ludicrious.

And you once again state as a FACT that Merv is the driving force behind licenses - a very dangerous situation as in his absence you then have to commit to their being no driving force. You may want to close your eyes to the facts that confront this company re charges against him but I dont. There have been 3 custodial sentences already so don't think this matter is not very very serious for GTG especially if as you say he is so important.

You can paint as rosy a picture as you like and continue to dismiss pertinent information as misleading because it doesnt suit your cause, but they are facts none the less that investors should be aware of. You seem to think that forums like these are only for good news and positive things and not for legitimate concerns. I disagree.

I wish no harm to GTG shareholders, I just believe that in addition to the rosy glowing picture you continual paint there needs to be some balance as to risk. People can make up their own minds and invest as they please but at least those that do so that have read the posts on this sight have some sense of reality of both the potential upsides and downsides.