@@cfcl
Of course we can, but the mere assertion that these two companies are in the same place from a development and timeline perspective is patently rubbish.
One company is charging towards BFS and closer to unlocking their senior funding package...the other doesn't even have a funding proposal on the table and has spent considerable effort into securing worthless offtake agreements.
I'm not nearly educated enough to comment on how these projects stack up, but from an investment perspective, it seems quite simple:
GPX: With a funding pathway, it presents a smaller risk profile.
WKT: No funding, it presents a higher risk profile.
FUNDING IS EVERYTHING - YOU EITHER HAVE IT OR YOU DONT, CLOSE ENOUGH ISN'T GOOD ENOUGH.
@@cfcl Of course we can, but the mere assertion that these two...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 128 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
