why did you underline as if to highlight the link to the article on her charges?
That's funny, for two reasons. One is that doing that amounts to gross deception, - and total loss of credibility. Its insulting too, because it assumes that readers are too stupid to know the truth.
But the really funny part is that it was Tony Abbott who was instrumental in her initial, - but later quashed, - conviction. You left out the one point that could have scored you a double goal....
