I just disagree with you here, you say we don't have the data,...

  1. 3,544 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 459
    I just disagree with you here, you say we don't have the data, yet you are happy to keep lock downs going. That's a contradiction.

    You can't assume that there would be more people dying if there wasn't a lockdown. From the US data, the spread was about the same in either case, so why do you assume more would die if we didn't lock down.

    In the NSW case, what number do we need to stay under for this to be a success?

    I am just not a fan because there was no cost benefit analysis done. A billion a week needs to save a boatload of lives IMO, and that isn't taking any of the physical / mental impacts into consideration as a result from the lockdown.


    I am a believer of innocent until proven guilty, but when it comes to governments, big pharma and big tech etc. I assume guilty until proven innocent, the big dollars at play easily corrupt a moral person, always look for facts that don't line up with the official word, if they start piling up then questions need to be answered.
 
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.