You are again interpreting the information, you aren't laying...

You are again interpreting the information, you aren't laying out only facts.

COP changed their wording. Is this really a surprise? the first one "Other planned dispositions" is regarding September quarter results for a transaction that closed after the quarter but before the report. You are reading far to much into this IMO, these notes are largely for the people making profit predictions for the next quarter and is standard in bluechips to report these in filings even if the occur after the period in question. The wording always changes when it is a future quarter being referenced or in the current period.

What we know is that FAR is seeking declaratory relief, but we don't know what that declaratory relief is for... is it on the notice, is it about the terms? is it whether the rights can legally be reinstated after this amount of time? is it whether the JOA rules above US / Australia / dutch / Senegalese corporate law / contract law?

Is declaratory relief the end of the argument? or is it the beginning of a new arbitration case? is the declaratory relief just confirming one of many links in FAR's case or is it the final ruling on the final matter? it really depends exactly what is being argued and if declaratory relief is granted on the wording.