Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

You are correct and i thought of posting the actual transcript...

First 37 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
Hairyback

46,401 Posts.

07/04/20

18:16

Post #: 43934686
Share

Originally posted by etherazer ↑

Reading the article you've posted, from memory I notice there are at least two key words in the High Court transcript that are deliberately missing from those paragraphs subtitled "Pell won today on a legal technicality".

Those words I recalled are "innocent man".
I'm thinking they're in the High Court transcript somewhere after "reasonable doubt" but I'm guessing they didn't suit the article author's aim to discredit the HC decision and therefore they were removed so the "legal technicality" lie could be pushed to back up their ABC's 'get Pell' agenda.

Expand

You are correct and i thought of posting the actual transcript from the high court but i thought haters will be haters.
6 Upvote

Reply

There are more pages in this discussion • 798 more messages in this thread...

First 37 Last