Not good enough for me, after the first jury reportedly split 10/2 in favour of acquittal. How on the second attempt they got 12 people to convict on what has been reported is beyond me. I don't know if there is anything that has not been reported, is there? The trial sounded like it was all based on what the accused and a single witness/alleged victim said. One person's word against another, very dangerous to form any sort of opinion on that. Mind you Pell kept incidents of abuse hidden for decades so probably deserves some punishment. But IMO the evidence in this particular case is inconclusive.
