If you had any understanding of the legal system, it was clear from the very beginning that Pell should not have been convicted on the evidence that was presented. The standard of beyond a reasonable doubt never came close to being met. It was a unanimous decision of all seven justices of the High Court. The original jury's decision was flawed because they failed to take into account the basic legal hurdle of BEYOND reasonable doubt.
- Forums
- Breaking News
- PELL
PELL, page-7
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 70 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)