If you had any understanding of the legal system, it was clear from the very beginning that Pell should not have been convicted on the evidence that was presented. The standard of beyond a reasonable doubt never came close to being met. It was a unanimous decision of all seven justices of the High Court. The original jury's decision was flawed because they failed to take into account the basic legal hurdle of BEYOND reasonable doubt.
- Forums
- Breaking News
- PELL
If you had any understanding of the legal system, it was clear...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 70 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Featured News
The Watchlist
FHE
FRONTIER ENERGY LIMITED
Adam Kiley, CEO
Adam Kiley
CEO
SPONSORED BY The Market Online