Well please show some academic honesty and integrity.
First: you should apologise to me for claiming that I didn't quote from the High Court judgement document, when in fact I did.
Second: you should acknowledge that "presumption of innocence" dates back to Roman Law. Where the onus is on the accuser to provide evidence of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
As such; the High Court have ruled that Cardinal Pell's conviction be quashed, therefore Cardinal Pell is now presumed innocent once again.
- Forums
- Political Debate
- Pell's Day of Reckoning
Pell's Day of Reckoning, page-219
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 25 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Featured News
The Watchlist
RDN
RAIDEN RESOURCES LIMITED
Dusko Ljubojevic, MD
Dusko Ljubojevic
MD
SPONSORED BY The Market Online