Assuming Nancy gets the ball rolling, I'm looking forward to the prosecutors of Trump trying to convince a Republican dominated senate that, if they look closely at a sentence and interpret "us" as meaning "me", they have grounds for dismissal.
Never mind that Selensky confirmed there was no QPQ, and, in 5 meetings, there was no link made between funding and an investigation, the prosecutors will want this same Republican strong group to believe the word of people who heard second hand accounts of phone calls, and made assumptions about there being links between funding and an investigation.
More popcorn required, this could make the Mueller report look good.
Pelosi's folly, page-100
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 41 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)