I really do not like the wording of the "licence fees" in milestone 3 as you have alluded to smac (great job by the way)
Why not simplify and make it "all product revenue" or the like as that is exactly what it is by glyns explanation, i dont understand the reasoning behind veil "license" when it clearly is not the case under any other definition but OBJs imo.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- WFL
- Performance Rights Milestone Clarification
Performance Rights Milestone Clarification, page-3
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 36 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add WFL (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
0.3¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $1.478M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
Featured News
WFL (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable