Peter Ridd admonished by Scientists, page-19

Nippy, you're missing the legal point. the Federal Court was asked to rule on whether he breached his employment contract.

Ridd's employment agreement did not give him an “untrammelled right” to express professional opinions beyond the standards imposed by the university’s code of conduct, the Federal Court found, according to the Guardian/AAP report.

fringe dwelling 'thinkers' boosted by for hire Institute for Private Avarice wrongly tried to turn it into a cause celebre about academic freedom.

Ridd agreed to the university's code of conduct, until it suited him not to for whatever reason.

i hope you made a solid contribution to his crowd funding, and income maintenance.