My point has always been the credibility of the data used to...

First 213 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
zipperlip

28,429 Posts.

250

09/08/20

21:42

Post #: 46412139
Share

Originally posted by bellcurve: ↑

zipperlip, those who accept the measured global warming over the past 140 years at least have that to go on.

which is a lot more than the simplistic denials by deniers that there is any warming at all, which are always made without reference to a credible source.

in fact climate change deniers don't know whether they're Arthur or Martha. Sometimes they deny any warming, and when this refuted by reference to credible sources they say the data must be tampered with.

And on and on it goes with deniers never making any headway because pseudoscience is no position at all.

these days as observed there is a trend for climate change deniers to deny their very own position.

I would too given that position is built on ignorance, arrogance, insults to normal rational people and total disrespect to science and all who ride in her.

and to make matters even worse, climate change deniers know that they only post rubbish but do it anyway. No wonder they get so offended when people call them out on it.

Expand

My point has always been the credibility of the data used to make the claims of impending doom is a bit thin.

Your good self believes that the science is proven beyond doubt and nothing anyone can say will change that.

I believe theories, modelling and forecasts are not necessarily based on all the facts because there is much that isn’t understood and you think it is rock solid regardless of the fact that scientists are add more pieces to the puzzle over the decades and still are readjusting these guesses as they progress.

You seem like a person who wants to open up all the presents a couple of days before Christmas, over eager and wanting instant gratification??
5 Upvote

Reply