Peter Ridd admonished by Scientists, page-4

I am unsure as to the angle you are coming from?

I take it that JCU won the appeal that they were lawful in sacking Peter Ridd because he was being a scientist and questioning the methodology of other scientist work and he was not cordial in his appraisal of there work?

Well if that is what the High Court has judged I cannot argue that they think it valid that Scientist cannot question other scientist work.

Heaven forbid that we here are forever questioning the opposing scientist work.