I am unsure as to the angle you are coming from?
I take it that JCU won the appeal that they were lawful in sacking Peter Ridd because he was being a scientist and questioning the methodology of other scientist work and he was not cordial in his appraisal of there work?
Well if that is what the High Court has judged I cannot argue that they think it valid that Scientist cannot question other scientist work.
Heaven forbid that we here are forever questioning the opposing scientist work.
- Forums
- Science & Medicine
- Peter Ridd admonished by Scientists
I am unsure as to the angle you are coming from? I take it that...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 135 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Featured News
The Watchlist
RAC
RACE ONCOLOGY LTD
Dr Pete Smith, Executive Chairman
Dr Pete Smith
Executive Chairman
SPONSORED BY The Market Online