Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

Peter Ridd admonished by Scientists, page-5

First 5 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
nippy

14,643 Posts.

887

22/07/20

20:24

Post #: 46033520
Share

Originally posted by jopo: ↑

I am unsure as to the angle you are coming from?

I take it that JCU won the appeal that they were lawful in sacking Peter Ridd because he was being a scientist and questioning the methodology of other scientist work and he was not cordial in his appraisal of there work?

Well if that is what the High Court has judged I cannot argue that they think it valid that Scientist cannot question other scientist work.

Heaven forbid that we here are forever questioning the opposing scientist work.

Expand

Are the judges all going to resign given that they questioned the decisions of the lower court judges?
12 Upvote

Reply

Top Stories

ASX Market Close: Another ATH close for Oz bourse on mining rally | July 2

Trump chides Powell as Goldman call for calm. The RBA must be nervous

Listen: HotCopper Wire Podcast 016 – FY25 ended up not so bad... but Trump unpause is coming

MEU

Double-time: Marmota starts deeper Greenewood drilling days after title transfer

Wednesday's HotCopper trends: Trigg $12.5M placement, Domino's shock exit | July 2

There are more pages in this discussion • 75 more messages in this thread...

First 5 Last

SPONSORED BY