So we take a 100 odd years snapshot of data to prove the a trend in a rock that has been spinning for how long?
Proof, that’s rock solid science we can take to the bank, believe with the divinity and conviction that the modelling is beyond question.
The abilities of science isn’t the question in whether MMCC is real but the true question is how accurate are our scientists based on accountable information.
Calling “Fact” on belief in untestable modelling is the folly as I see it.
- Forums
- Science & Medicine
- Peter Ridd admonished by Scientists
So we take a 100 odd years snapshot of data to prove the a trend...
- There are more pages in this discussion • 169 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)