I am unsure as to the angle you are coming from?
I take it that JCU won the appeal that they were lawful in sacking Peter Ridd because he was being a scientist and questioning the methodology of other scientist work and he was not cordial in his appraisal of there work?
Well if that is what the High Court has judged I cannot argue that they think it valid that Scientist cannot question other scientist work.
Heaven forbid that we here are forever questioning the opposing scientist work.
- Forums
- Science & Medicine
- Peter Ridd admonished by Scientists
Peter Ridd admonished by Scientists, page-4
- There are more pages in this discussion • 371 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)