So it begs the question, who is going to ask about the 95%...

So it begs the question, who is going to ask about the 95% Confidence Intervals for the Australian data?

The update was published on 22 July 2017, less than a month ago, but with NO confidence intervals.
https://www.resapphealth.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/1684564.pdf

To put this in lay terms...the test result was 89% sensitivity for pneumonia in the 123 patients studied (with cough, age, gender, symptoms)

The 95% confidence interval is a statistically calculated range that states the likelihood that the result falls in that range.

If for example the 95%CI for the 89% result was say 85%-95%, then there is a 19/20 chance the result lies in that range, ie happy days

If, on the other hand, the range was 40%-95%, hello, we have a very uncertain result.

Can someone ask about the Aussie results...I cannot think why this valuable metric was omitted from the recent update.