Jeez, I didn't even realise it was that long... My sentiments...

Jeez, I didn't even realise it was that long...

My sentiments back then are the same as a lot of people now... Everyone holding obviously wants the company to succeed. I guess seeing the complications and development requirements over the years including the endless BS with feasibility studies, government approvals, financing and engineering challenges etc. has tempered my speedy resolution expectations. It's a huge bloody project.

I guess ultimately I just don't see what the change in management here will achieve. The hurdles that are there will still be there even if the change happens.

Like I said, I'm not opposed to change (it probably would be a good thing), but not at all cost and not to people without experience.

Re the temporary board argument - sure. I'm also sure they'll be paid for the privilige. And could still be looking for their replacements in 3 years time, either doing well or putting the development further behind. And temporary or not, my comments about their bios still stand...