Not in line with your original question but more a comment on PHY.
Like you, I hold PHY for the long term. I like the sector, thier strong balance sheet and potential for good returns.
I received a shareholders letter from the MD the other day about climate change and a recommendation to lobby your local member re MRET.
While it was good to receive the letter it left a couple worrying feelings in my mind:-
* Three articles included seemed superflous to the aurgument. They cost me to produce and post!
* The articles were referenced but poorly. Publication but no date for one, Publication but no date for a second, Organization only for the third (WWF)
* The letter contained reference to another document that wasn't included.
It might be nit-picking but I hope their detail to projects is not as sloppy!
I'll hang in there
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- phy v ene
phy v ene, page-5
Featured News
Featured News
The Watchlist
LU7
LITHIUM UNIVERSE LIMITED
Alex Hanly, CEO
Alex Hanly
CEO
SPONSORED BY The Market Online