Not sure if you're aware that a pixel always moves to its fullest extension irrespective of the frequency/volume?
Also, could you explain why it is that you think that highly compressed air generated (and then low pressure on the down stroke) in front of each pixel due to their fast movement won't result in higher volume? Also, what issues do you see with the maths in the video I linked to which is used to calculate the theoretical output volume? This is one of the key differences between traditional speakers and AKP's design, i.e. that AKP's design doesn't have to match the movement of an individual pixel to the input frequency and hence they can create more pressure per speaker surface area.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- AKP
- Please kindly explain
Please kindly explain, page-39
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 61 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
FWD
Queensland's housing crisis an opportunity for ASX builder Fleetwood – and taxpayer cash a safe harbour from the storm
SKS
SKS Technologies wins US$90M award to supply power to international hyperscale data centre in Melbourne
Add AKP (ASX) to my watchlist
|
|||||
Last
$6.20 |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $181.1M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
Featured News
AKP (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable