If you look at Para 20 Manning states "De Graf was reluctant to talk about GDY, why he left or why he was pursuing a different type of technology"
I think it entirely proper to be reluctant to discuss in detail the fortunes of one's previous employer or one's reasons for leaving.
In para 21 DG gives I believe entirely proper answers re GDY but more importantly he explains why he did not pursue HSA with GDY. What more does he need to do?
IMHO the article is a beat up.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- PAX
- plenty of hot air but little to show
plenty of hot air but little to show, page-2
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 5 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)