I have some spare time to read your prediction you made on 4 May 2024. And let's talk about it now.
Acting like an FA bigshot you lectured
@trent3727 as follows:
"With experience you’ll come to learn the market is a forward looking construct so whilst even the dopiest perma-bear would know lithium prices have experienced a pullback sometimes termed “the lithium winter” sentiment and momentum is now factoring a resumption of positive news for lithium producers and investors. SP is now beginning to reflect that. PLS will push thru $4.20 this week and retest $4.30. Exciting and profitable times ahead!"
Post #:73667218By saying "With experience you'll come to learn ...", you implicitly claim you have had the experience. Wow!!
That is something I will never say. That is one difference between you and I.
And you wouldn't be a Master of Cliche if you didn't put some jargon you picked in the street: “the lithium winter”.
Wannabes love using jargons, because they think jargons make them sound knowledgeable!! But you can't fool me, Ink Blot.
Then you predicted:
"PLS will push thru $4.20 this week and retest $4.30."
You got it wrong. And I didn't mock you then for getting wrong and I won't do it now. That is because a prediction can only be either right or wrong.
But there is a difference in the way you and I make prediction. You made your prediction without providing any evidence or data to support. All you provided were a jargon and a wild guess on the change of sentiment. And because of that your prediction is in truth based on your own sentiment and wishful thinking.
On the other hand, I always provide data (charts and patterns) to support my argument and conclusion. Even if my conclusion turns out to be false, unlike you, I provide my reasoning based on the available data.
I have challenged you to show that technical analysis is no more than wishful thinking. So far you fail to deliver. All you can do is to mock.
That is cheap! And childish!
But I am not surprised. I notice your whole project in HotCopper is based on pretence and fakery.
Just look at your choice of name: Rorschach. You chose that to impress us that you are educated and an intellectual just like Hermann Rorschach.
But your posts don't show you are an intellectual. Show me one that shows that you are.
(20min delay)