Sorry Binwood no transparency you’ve glossed over a lot. Starting with the 0.69% figure.
Your post stated, “as such, went away and did my own research”. Is this meant to separate what Ken said from what you are transmitting/stating? So Ken can distance himself from any statement made here?
Still dodging the reporting of the 0.69% over other JORC data especially Ore reserve % means breach of JORC code does it not?
content ‘outside’ resource as fringe and edge but it’s the seams that are the fringe and edge extraction wise.
"So from there we move to our reserve category which has a global grade of 1.08% from announcement late last year."So your admitting the Fe2O3 % content is 1.08%
Why do PLS bother to do a meaningless ‘optimisation’ via (bias?) select statistical application to reach 0.69%?
If it means nothing why exclude ore reserve % on a page of the latest presentation and only show the global 0.69%?
If it means "nothing" it's more a case of wanting it to mean nothing. Just like ROFR...
PLS Price at posting:
80.5¢ Sentiment: Hold Disclosure: Not Held
(20min delay)