It's worth listing Koala's questions directly.BTW, the other day...

It's worth listing Koala's questions directly.

BTW, the other day Koala went LIVE 1 on 1 with the 3 kids on a Twitter spaces.
He ripped them new ones.
Every dumb concern they had... he explained in extreme detail and gave examples.

One question was..."ya, but permitting in Canada is really difficult."
Then, Koala goes NO, it's actually straight forward and compared to other countries.
Then the muppet said just 2 mins later. "so whats involved in Canadian permitting?"

WHAT? One second your stating a fact. Then you ask how it works?
What level of stupidity is that?
(They CLAIM to be "experienced" miners, investment bankers and investors?? )

*They have NO CLUE about anything.
In the end the loud one conceded they don't know much, they just stir people up for clicks and views.
THAT'S WHAT HE SAID!!
FMD!

BTW...
After, Koala went on to give a masterclass in detailing the Quebec permitting and how it works at each level and gave other miners as examples.

IMO, if Blair is to be replaced...I want Koala running PMT.

Lastly,
I hate know it all jerks who speak in 3rd person.
However, you AREN'T a know it all jerk....if you actually know everything to which you're talking about and are respectful.


Here are his questions he wasn't able to answer...
*If he was able to ask them, the CC would have be a lot better and maybe we are up 5-10% ?


The koala probably cannot be on this $PMET$PMT$PMT.AX call live due to more important obligations But a few thoughts from the eucalyptus tree the koala will be listening for when replay is availableWhere is Exploration team planning the first 20-30 holes now that drilling can happen again?What wildcat target is priority after cv-13? The koala biased to cv-9 but defers to the actual geologists who seem to k is what they are doing Mkt clearly wants to see the potential for more deposits within the trendWill a Pre-Feasibility study be done just on CV5 or could CV13 be incorporated?How many meters/holes planned for cv-13? Reason the koala curious is imagine a 30-50mm t resource of 1-1.2% at cv-13 given the dms favorable characteristics similar to cv5 On the non-binding 9 month MOU with Albemarle, has ALB indicated a preference for size/scale of a hydroxide facility? (Matters because can signal minimum scope of phase 1 corvette…let’s people do back of the envelope scoping study themselves)In light of this being a hard dollar placement, what will this enable the company to be more aggressive on that flow through funds wouldn’t cover?On the maiden resource there was a pit shell constraint so some mineralization did not make it in. What would the unconstrained resource have been and how many meters/holes would it take upgrade that tonnage? Is that even a priority versus other uses of drilling time?What drilling is possible in the fall when helicopters can’t fly in the fog/mist?Just align market expectations of what drillings news cadence will beAnd since every skeptic brings up permitting, probably touch on that process a bitMore to come as the koala thinks about it more today…