If your role is as a commentator, specifically a low sentiment...

If your role is as a commentator, specifically a low sentiment commentator because lets be honest thats the only thing consistent in your commentary, why not put more effort into your posts? where are the sources, where is the validity. You post only about this stock, you have a model which appears to be flawless in its ability to generate profits on PNV, and your a self proclaimed lover of trading. I assume you know pretty much everything there is to know about this company in order to maintain a complex highly specific model like yours,. why can you offer any substance in your commentary

Your alternative point of view boils down to 1 or 2 sentence answers, often with riddles intermixed, that will make a claim like "i see it going lower to low 1.60s within 2 weeks" or whatever you said exactly. Every rational investor here would brush off your point of view because it is so limited in its complexity