firdy
That's my thinking exactly -
Juniors that will become low cost producers with big or growing resources -
I'm aiming for cash costs of $350/oz or lower.
But there's 3 more boxes they have to tick for me -
1. they must carry no Debt
2. They must have the plant and equipment to start mining.
3. They must have a mining licence and have started to mine.
Why look for ones with no no Debt ?
Let's say you've done your homework and you find a couple of good candidates and ignore their debt levels - at the EBIT stage the debt interest may take another $100/oz or more away. This adds $100/oz or more to the production costs which looked cheap.
also the ones with no debt wont need to capital raise - especially if they have started to produce and have a positive cash flow.
I cant believe the indiscriminate carnage that has happened to gold stocks with both low cost and high cost producers being hit.
Low cost producers should have escaped.
amongst this carnage I believe I have found 2 low cap juniors owning all their necessary plant and equipment and that are starting to produce with no debt.
So hopefully one good thing has come out of it - the future will show whether this is the case.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- pog is out of sync with costs
firdyThat's my thinking exactly - Juniors that will become low...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 1 more message in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add GOLD (COMEX) to my watchlist
The Watchlist
LU7
LITHIUM UNIVERSE LIMITED
Alex Hanly, CEO
Alex Hanly
CEO
SPONSORED BY The Market Online