point 39 and 40, page-5

Check this out.

http://www.heathgate.com.au/thebeverleymine.html

Under "Beverley North"... last sentence reads:

"The area is highly prospective and further mining is likely to follow on from these initial deposits."

Firstly... this is great. Heathgate thinks there is probably more U and it's sitting on the JV boundary so it prob extends into our turf.

Secondly... I can't believe they have this on their website when the whole case around Four Mile relates to disclosure of prospectivity levels.

Heathgate are openly stating the "area" around Beverley North (which sits on the boundary of Four Mile) is highly prospective.

Just wondering if Alliance has been formally notified by Heathgate that up in the northern part of Four Mile it is highly prospective?

I'm going to guess that Alliance has not because I don't remember seeing any announcement indicating a Heathgate endorsement of a potential Four Mile North deposit/s.

Am I onto something here or am I just fishing? Didn't Heathgate use the phrase "fishing" in their defence? lol

Anyway, I think it's rather ironic that a statement like this can be on a page of the Heathgate website at this point in time.