Due to popular demand, I'll transfer comment from Media Thread:
RedCedar, I don't care if it's 100%, it's still just an opinion.
You used the term "scientific method" earlier in relation to climate science, so could you please:
1. State the falsifiable climate change theory. No one seems to want to do this.
2. Identify any hypotheses derived from this climate change theory that have been empirically tested.
3. Explain how you reconcile the term "settled science", in relation to climate change, with the contingent nature of scientific knowledge
4. Explain how climate scientists can perform the role of 'disinterested observer' in testing the climate change theory when falsification of the theory may mean there is no longer a need for the climate science discipline, and they can go back to wearing their underpants on the inside of their trousers and take up meteorology, atmospheric physics, or religion etc.
Thanks in advance.
Pointless Climate Change Arguments, page-3
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 4 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add SLX (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
$3.89 |
Change
-0.010(0.26%) |
Mkt cap ! $921.4M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| $3.91 | $3.94 | $3.80 | $4.921M | 1.265M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | 36946 | $3.89 |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| $3.92 | 315 | 1 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 30/08/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| SLX (ASX) Chart |