what is scary about this thread is we have people openly stating that they find 13 year old children sexually stimulating and can't believe any one that says they don't.
This not only scares me but angers me.
The child molestor justifies his actions.
There has been a enough said by one poster in particular on this thread who took a long time and a number of posts to out himself that should be further investigated.
The debate of art vs pornograghy is a red herring.
No one has suggested that the work is pornographic have they?
It is exploitation of children...for what purpose only the artist, the promotor and the parents can state. You would have to be a bit tunnel visioned if you think any one finds it pornographic.
But again it doesn't have to be pornographic to be wrong...and you don't have to see the photos to know that exploitation of children is wrong..whether in the name of art or any other reason.
If however you as an adult find the body of a 13 year old breaching adolesence sexually stimulating then you have a very serious problem and attempting to justify on a forum such as this whilst looking for kindred spirits will not help you or society at large.
Zen...seek professional help...you my friend are a pedofile
Pedophiles Often Prefer Children Close to Puberty:
Pedophiles often have a specific age of child they target. Some prefer younger children, some older. Often his environment or a special room will be decorated in child-like decor and will appeal to the age and sex of the child he is trying to entice. Many pedophiles often prefer children close to puberty who are sexually inexperienced, but curious about sex
