The US gov't is comming under immense pressure as the flu...

The US gov't is comming under immense pressure as the flu worsens - with news tonight that 16000 nurses will strike over lack of protection for themselves and lack of iv antivirals for patients.The vaccine estimates are comming down and down - look for a re-rating of antvirals over longer term to over 80% pop as the polititions have to be seen to be doing something even if not immediate - maybe a fast track of lani may evolve from this sooner than later!
The whitehouse will also be demanding further ramping of production for all flu products and the pharmas will have to listen to there biggest customer.


U.S. government faces no-win fight with flu

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Vaccine Shortage Is Political Test for White House

WASHINGTON — The moment a novel strain of swine flu emerged in Mexico last spring, President Obama instructed his top advisers that his administration would not be caught flat-footed in the event of a deadly pandemic. Now, despite months of planning and preparation, a vaccine shortage is threatening to undermine public confidence in government, creating a very public test of Mr. Obama’s competence.

The shortage, caused by delays in the vaccine manufacturing process, has put the president in exactly the situation he sought to avoid — one in which questions are being raised about the government’s response.

Aware that the president would be judged on how well he handled his first major domestic emergency, the Obama administration left little to chance. It built a new Web site, Flu.gov — a sort of one-stop shopping for information about H1N1, the swine flu virus. It staged role-playing exercises for public health officials and members of the news media.

It commissioned public service announcements, featuring the fuzzy Sesame Street characters Elmo and Rosita singing in English and Spanish about “the right way to sneeze.” The president added a swine flu update to his regular intelligence briefing — he also receives an in-depth biweekly memorandum on the prevalence of the disease worldwide and in the United States — and appeared in the Rose Garden to urge Americans to wash their hands.

Early on, Mr. Obama told his aides he wanted them to “learn from past mistakes,” said John O. Brennan, Mr. Obama’s domestic security adviser, who has been coordinating the flu-preparedness effort.

Mr. Obama and his top aides studied earlier flu outbreaks, including one in 2004, when a vaccine shortage created a political problem for President George W. Bush, and another in 1976, when President Gerald R. Ford ordered a mass vaccination campaign for an epidemic that never materialized — and faced intense criticism for it.

In late June, Mr. Obama invited veterans of the 1976 effort to a private meeting in the White House Roosevelt Room, and asked what his own role should be. (Mr. Ford was photographed being vaccinated; Mr. Obama has not yet received his flu shot because children, pregnant women and people with underlying health conditions are being vaccinated first.)

“We talked very realistically,” said Dr. David Mathews, who was Mr. Ford’s health secretary, “about the fine line he has to walk in being responsive and showing people that he cares, and that the federal government is on top of the issue, and on the other hand not provoking undue fear or irrational responses.”

Dr. Mathews advised Mr. Obama, “You’ve got to be willing to take the criticisms for being over-prepared, because there’s no defense for being underprepared.”

Now, with officials at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reporting that H1N1 is widespread in 46 states, public health experts and leading senators are giving the Obama administration only mixed grades. “I would give them a B for performance so far,” said Dr. Eric Toner, a senior associate at the Center for Biosecurity at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, who has advised the administration on pandemic planning.

The administration gets high marks for its public education campaign, as well as the scientific effort to develop and test a vaccine. “The vaccine was miraculously developed,” said Senator Joseph I. Lieberman, the Connecticut independent who was chairman of an oversight hearing last week on the government’s response to the outbreak.

But the administration, and in particular Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius, have come in for strong criticism from those who say they created a false sense of expectations with overly optimistic predictions about the availability of the vaccine.

“The fact that there are vaccine shortages is a huge problem,” said Senator Susan Collins, Republican of Maine and co-chairwoman of last week’s hearing with Mr. Lieberman. “I believe the administration took the pandemic seriously, but I also believe administration officials were so determined to show that everything was under control that they sent the wrong signals about the adequacy of supplies of the vaccine.”

Ms. Sebelius has said she was relying on estimates from manufacturers, who reported in July that 120 million doses of vaccine would be available by the end of this month — a figure that was later lowered to 40 million doses, and then lowered again. She said Wednesday that 23.2 million doses had become available, including 9 million in the last week alone.

Accepting the manufacturers’ assurances may have been “naïve on our part,” Ms. Sebelius said in an interview. But she said Mr. Obama recognized that the matter was beyond the government’s control. “If we could wave a magic wand or have the tools in our government shop to fix this,” she said, “I think there would be a different expectation.”

For a president whose aides regard him as the best communicator in the administration, Mr. Obama has been relatively low profile during the pandemic. When he declared a national emergency over the weekend, he used a written proclamation. His Rose Garden appearance lasted just five minutes. His last public reference to H1N1 came on Sept. 23 — one line in a speech to the United Nations General Assembly, in which he promised to contribute vaccine to the World Health Organization.

Anita Dunn, Mr. Obama’s communications director, said the president’s “voice has been heard, and will be heard again.”

But for any president, epidemics pose a tricky challenge. The public typically prefers to get its health information from trusted medical professionals, not politicians. The topic of how the president should engage came up in the Roosevelt Room session about the lessons of 1976.

“We talked about the role of the president,” Dr. Mathews said, “and our advice was, ‘If you’re not visible at all, it seems like a dereliction of duty, but you really need not to get so far out in front that it seems political.’ ”

If the pace of vaccine production picks up, and the shots reach the public in time to keep people from getting sick, Mr. Obama is unlikely to come in for personal blame.

But flu outbreaks are notoriously unpredictable; if the pandemic takes a turn for the worse, the president may be held accountable even for a situation that is beyond his control, said Robert Blendon, a professor of health policy and political analysis at the Harvard School of Public Health.

“Where people start holding political actors accountable is when they develop an expectation for what is to happen,” Dr. Blendon said. “If very few people get sick and those who do are not very seriously ill, the public will have a much higher tolerance than if there are people who are dying.”