Let’s just get really clear about how out there this view is -
the claim - A Shorten Labor Government would have been better for PSD because NAIF.
the reality - April 2019, then opposition leader Bill Shorten, campaigning in the seat of Herbert promises to kill the NAIF, with transitional arrangements for projects funded before that announcement in April 2019.
i disagree with this entire view and encourage the original poster to read what the NAIF actually is, and get super clear about the difference between what their political views may be and what is best for their investments. Be super objective about it, your analysis will improve.
political, page-8
Add SFG (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
0.3¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $12.09M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 0.3¢ | 0.3¢ | 0.3¢ | $2.942K | 1.176M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 28 | 26544290 | 0.2¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 0.3¢ | 16347915 | 12 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 13.47pm 09/09/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| SFG (ASX) Chart |