Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

How about per capita per 1000 km's of road network?Roads are a...

First 4 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
ejd99

1,503 Posts.

10

16/02/24

16:38

Post #: 72448957
Share

Originally posted by mytresaw: ↑

First I disclose that I embrace the fact of anthropomorphic climate change due to release of greenhouse compounds into the atmosphere. The energising of the atmosphere is a clear and present danger. BUT, I object strongly to the use of “pollution per capita” to apportion blame, particularly to Australia. Reason: it is such a stupid metric in that the number can be reduced by increasing the population rather than reducing pollution.
A far more equitable metric would be “pollution per unit of land area”. Then all those finger pointing South Pacific island nations would have to pull their heads in. To propose as they do, (and our dumb lollies comply) that Australia’s tiny output increases sea level only in our vicinity, is nonsense.

Expand

How about per capita per 1000 km's of road network?
Roads are a necessity to transport goods and people.
Upvote

Reply

Top Stories

With financials holding the fort, materials must step up with some heavy lifting to stimulate stocks

Eurozone-based companies find new ways to secure a regional lithium supply

Time for retail therapy buying in the shopping Scentre for hot stocks

End of FY is a time to juggle wins, losses and capital gains taxes

SS1

Sun Silver submits US$60M Silver Paste Funding Application to US DoE

First 4 Last