I ROFL laugh at this thread.The pictures were portraits, they...

I ROFL laugh at this thread.

The pictures were portraits, they were not sexual, they were not demeaning, it would be something you would see on a European beach.

However you have labeled Henson with names which would be considered as slanderous, abusive and exploitive. Many of the same play on world that are use by many to prosecute.

If you are going to argue a point back it up with substance rather that BS.

If you think its pornography, why is it pornography. And how are similar things in society portrayed to substanciate your argument. i.e A stripper at the foot ball field..is that pornography...lets be consistent.

Is it Art, what value does it have to society, what harm is it causing. Exploitation possibly, but we can start moving in to the realm of underage fashion models and even child prodigies, just to name a few.

Debate, is good, but please look at the issue as whole rather a myopic view of the situation.

The more you think, the more you may realise its shade of gray rather than a black and white argument....but please THINK..