Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

I can see why she worried about the conflict of interest, if she...

First 35 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
DrStrangelove

15,081 Posts.

26/05/21

20:19

Post #: 53439083
Share

Originally posted by pow4ade: ↑

Asked by Porter’s barrister, Christopher Withers SC, whether Dyer agreed with her friend, she said she had “thought the allegation needed to be tested”.

When Withers pushed her on whether she “believed” her friend’s allegations against Porter, Dyer said: “Yes.”

“On that basis you believed Porter should not ever become prime minister?” Withers asked.

“Yes,” Dyer responded.

“And one of the things you needed [for that to happen] was for these allegations to become public?” Withers asked.

"Yes,” Dyer responded.

So the primary intention of the main instigator was for Porter to be named and shamed. This seems to me to be a damning admission.

https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2021/may/25/friend-of-christian-porters-accuser-wanted-allegation-public-to-stunt-political-career-court-hears

Expand

I can see why she worried about the conflict of interest, if she candidly revealed same and more to applicants barrister beforehand.

It's almost like it was supposed to play out this way.
Upvote

Reply

There are more pages in this discussion • 167 more messages in this thread...

First 35 Last