Obviously there's material there which Porter deems malicous, frivolous or vexatious. So why should it be made public and unfairly blacken the blokes name when its not legally actionable. Of course the media will argue its in the public interest, they always do. BTW, 9 is a lefty outlet. As is news.com.au.
Porter vs The ABC not done & dusted.......yet, page-6
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 24 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)