Can't disagree with what you say, Seals. It is a tough call for...

Can't disagree with what you say, Seals. It is a tough call for us all, which way to vote.

We will all hate the dilution, but you do make a good point re the security of funding by voting NO. And of course we will still have the copper and Fowlers Bay on either option YES or NO.

Mmmmmmm, what to do?

I remember reading on someone's recent posting here re it's better to get something even if it is diluted. Yes, 50% of x is better than 100% of SFA.

I think we need Mr. Tilbrook to put out a blurb (like he did when trying to unseat David Harley) to we shareholders, to tell us all his intentions. If he were to let us know his position on this it would make our decision easier. For instance, if he is going to vote NO and back this up with some serious funds for Gunson to move forward without this massive dilution, then voting NO becomes a lot easier to do and we move forward on our current projects.

Are you out there Mr. Tilbrook? Let's hear from you!