My recommendation would be the more the merrier.
I can understand people may not have the time or effort to warrant drafting their own questions or responses but I'm sure if more people emailed the company with their own clarifications or even supporting the email from myself stating their support it can only do more to influence the situation.
If I've not heard a response by cob Friday. I will contact them via phone Monday and explain the inundation of support clearly wanted by collective shareholders. additionally if they're actually forming a decent response this would warrant a couple days.
what's been even more interesting is there have been a number of non-holders also supporting the email. Clear concise transparent comms, does not only provide on-going support from the current shareholder base it goes a long way to attracting outside investment. which is, fundamentally what increases the s/p. additional investment.
Not that I'm a spokesperson for the entire share registry, but all of whom I have spoken to, and those that have indicated their support to the email would be a fairly robust reasoning that my clarifications are limited to a few retail investor. as a collective the sentiment here would be reflected across wider audiences.
additionally, been some critical feedback I'd like to address.
1) that I'm not a shareholder
@Jens - you would want to clarify that source. or refer back to posts of mine over the last 2 years on avz. avz can check my details on their register.
2) that management/company don't owe the petty shareholders anything. I personally can add up approx 100m shares of people who share my sentiment. add in the 150-200 people that have supported this post and all other additional that exist but do not read HC. whilst my personal gripes may not warrant clarification I think I represent a decent collective portion of sentiment of the market.
