I didn’t raise the smoking/lung cancer topic into the conversation, just pointed out that smoking isn’t the only reason for lung cancer. With the reduced participation rate the percentage of non smokers afflicted should go up, shouldn’t it?
PS There’s very clear evidence that if you don’t smoke lung cancer risk is very low did I suggest that was untrue? —- I notice you haven’t commented on the U of Vic’s decision to excommunicate Dr Susan for pointing out that polar bears aren’t threatened by MMCC at this point in time?
