possiblity for sell off?, page-33

IGCC is good news for Coldry (if it happens in a big way). But its presently hugely expensive.

"The main problem for IGCC is its extremely high capital cost, upwards of $3,593/kW...v. $1,290 for a conventional clean coal facility"

The "ideal" new coal plant would be Coldry feedstock (pre-combustion), IGCC, and CCS (post-combustion)

That wont ever happen - massive cost would make wind look attractive. The most viable direction is a Coldry/IGCC combo - skip the CCS.

Both are ready to go proven techs that will deliver 40-55% (probably alot higher as those figures relate to Coldry burnt in standard black coal boilers - IGCC will substantially improve the efficiency) emission reductions - good enough to satisfy most critics. The remaining 45-60% "could" be removed by unproven/expensive CCS - remains to be seen.

The most "viable" new coal plant is the one ESI constantly refer to - Coldry/ultra supercritacal boilers combo. Very "doable" from an economic and enviro perspective.

In any case - Coldry has most bases covered - including IGCC.

"We now have an independent third party report in-hand confirming new generation coal power stations, which will undoubtedly use gasification technology, are another global market for ECT to capture."

http://74.125.153.132/search?q=cache:2eiXAii0rvcJ:www.abnnewswire.net/press/en/56792/Environmental-Clean-Technologies-Limited.html+gasification+ect&cd=5&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=au

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IGCC