Here is an old post of mine on western medicine. I know its hard...

Here is an old post of mine on western medicine. I know its hard for you to actually look for info so I have reprinted it. PS Don't thank me it won't happen again. LOL

Those downrampers just get more and more miffed on good results team. As Jack N said "You (They) just can't handle the truth." The best anyone has come up with (is old Jeffa) to try and discredit SLA is that unrelated article about Dr S from 2005 re Today Tonight. Although.... once again nothing to do with SLA the good Doctor helped some people with a diet and fasting and fixed their ailments. These people were happy for what he did for them and approached the media (they were not unhappy/disgruntled or say the treatments failed). TNT then gets a comment from another doctor who says fasting is not a good idea but not from any of the people who did it and got great results. The downrampers have got absolutely nothing negative on SLA it has all been positive with more to follow soon. They even piffle on about non western approval(yet)/ standards which are pathetic in some cases anyway. All they have to do is look at the defective drug list out there. Viagra is defective but bet some of them will still take it for a Boner. We will get ours the natural way by following SLA and its product line. :) Relenza ...defective. so on and so on....So much really for western approvals. Defective drugs defined.... A defective drug is one whose potential risks outweigh its intended benefits. The mere fact that a drug possesses serious dangers does not always mean it will be taken off the market. Instead, drug companies are likely only to add a warning to its labeling, allowing the drug to continue to be sold to unsuspecting patients. Drug manufacturers are corporations, and as such their duty of loyalty is owed first and foremost to their shareholders. This means that drug companies, like most other large corporations, are primarily driven by money and profit per share. Unfortunately, drug companies have been caught manipulating test information and often downplaying the possible adverse side effects found in their drugs. Compounding the problem is the fact that the Federal Drug Administration (FDA) often fails to conduct adequate research on drug products or devotes less than sufficient time to perform a thorough screening of drug products. This can lead to the approval of dangerous and defective drugs. The one countermeasure to this dilemma is the lawyers who represent victims in product liability actions against the drug companies in which they demand both compensation and sometimes punitive damages for their injured clients. Defective Drugs With Side Effects Choose from the drugs listed below to learn about their intended usage. A - D E - O * Accolate * Accutane * Alfa/Recombinant * Androstenedione * Anti-Fungal * Aranesp * Ativan * Avandia * Baycol * Bextra * Celebrex * Cisapride * Colchicine * Crestor * Cyclosporine * DES * Dexamethasone * Drotrecogin * Duract * Enbrel * Ephedra * Epogen * Fen-Phen * Herceptin * Hismanal * Lamisil * Lamictal * Lotronex * Mellaril * Meridia * Natrecor * Neurontin * Nevirapine * Norplant * OxyContin P - T V - Z * Posicor * PPA * Pregabalin * Procardia * Procrit * Propulsid * Prozac * Ramipril * Raxar * Redux * Relenza * Rezulin * Risperdal * Ritalin * RotaShield * RU-486 * Seldane * Serentil * Simulect * Tasmar * Thalidomide * Valium * Vanceril * Viagra * Videx * Viga * Vioxx * Viramune * Xeloda * Xolair * Zerit * Zyprexa The challenge is there still tosspot downrampers show us something/anything negative about SLA or its products or just watch from the sidelines as the story unfolds and we accumulate and make some $$$$ along the way. :) Lets give some credence to testing/discoveries not made via the usual corrupt western standard!!!!!! SEE HOW OUR CORRUPT MEDICAL SYSTEM WORKS Would you put a paedophile in charge of a nursery ? Yet in our orthodox medical system we have the equivalent of this. INSIDE MEDICINE: There is clear proof that many so-called 'licensed medicines', whether prescription or off-the-shelf are really just commercial products - not medicines ! Many licensed medicines are just a big con because they do not cure people. Some of course may provide temporary relief, but in the long-term untold damage is done to the patient - then more drugs will be prescribed ! Pharmaceutical companies pay a licensing fee to their own, highly prejudiced, self-regulating body, now called Medicines & Healthcare Regulatory Agency (MHRA) was previously known as the Medicine Control Agency (MCA), which conveniently allows them to market their goods. Our MHRA is supposed to ensure the 'safety' of all drugs and is supposed to warn us of toxic and addictive drugs that can cause serious ADR's to us. But the MHRA is surprise, surprise run by the drug companies, for the drug companies. So we can hardly expect the MHRA which is made up of pharmaceutical people, to give us the truth. Money will always come first, before the safety of you and your family. For example: GlaxoSmithKline claimed their best-selling anti-depressant drug 'Seroxat' (2001 sales were £1.86 billion) wasn't addictive, when of course it was! Our own farcical MHRA and CSM (Committee Safety of Medicines) approved the drug's information leaflet which stated the tablets are not addictive. Well done to the 'Social Audit' consumer group who proved the drug company had breached the industry's code of practice. (Guardian 12-10-02 Page 7) Read into the way they work -The MHRA have three main objectives: Meet appropriate standards of safety (are meaningless when many drugs hospitalize and kill people regularly, therefore, so-called safety cannot be guaranteed when the majority of patients take more than one prescription drug at a time) Meet standards of quality (yes pills do meet conformity standards but with increasing mortality statistics again it is meaningless) Meet standards of efficacy (where no strict rules apply ! That's why there are many useless toxic prescription drugs together with the 'off-the-shelf' pseudo-medicines, like over 200 licensed flu & cough medicines which are ineffective along with many other drugs for common ailments.) Remember, a dummy pill or placebo has been scientifically proven to have a 35% success rate in helping patients, and this is what the devious drug companies play on. Of course, some 'licensed medicines' do work, but with around 4,000 drugs listed in the GP's reference bible, the British National Formulary, our GP's working knowledge of drugs is very limited, and with the endless flow of new drugs on the market with conflicting clinical evidence, our hard-working GP's are faced with a daunting and confusing picture to choose the right drug, if indeed there is one! Drug companies go out on a limb to hold back important and damaging drug data from doctors. They hide and conceal incriminating evidence in almost 75% of all their clinical trials. Drug companies have the worst record for refusing to publish scientific papers on their new drugs ! Pharmaceutical people work in a veil of secrecy making them completely untrustworthy, yet the majority of the media, MP's and our orthodox medical system suck up to these large corporate businesses - money, money, money ! Doctors and patients and the rest of us have no right to know why a drug was approved for a licence in the first place, and we are refused access to the clinical data on which a new drug was judged to be safe and effective. And there is no information on what exactly the drug in question contains !!! Unbelieveable isn't it ? Drug companies operate in a cosy, protective cocoooon because they deal direct with Government officials, not the public, where they sell their phoney drugs to our NHS. (It should be called the NDS, the National Drug System not Health !) And ironically, we as taxpayers contribute and pay towards their corrupt system of research just so they can hospitalize and contaminate us. Our cash-starved NHS crumbles while pharmaceuticals reap bumper profits. WHY DO OUR DEDICATED GP's SUPPORT THIS CORRUPT SYSTEM ? ASK THEM ! Because they don't have a choice and you do ? Over decades, hundreds of thousands of people have been unnecessary killed through ADR's. Yet no patient group action against drug companies has ever reached our courts. Drug companies avoid bad publicity by merely making out-of-court settlements to the victim's families. Then its business as usual ! Pharmaceutical companies get up to every conceivable dirty trick you can imagine just to peddle their dangerous, toxic drugs. And to make matters worse, the majority of national newspapers support them owing to their owners and shareholders having financial stakes in drug companies along with MP's. The TV, Press & Magazines, they too have nice little earners from drug companies' advertising their 'off-the-shelf' pseudo-medicines. In the World Health Organization database there are some 1.8 billion 'Adverse Drug Reactions' (ADR) listed compared to 9,000 herbal remedies. Very few herbal medicines actually interact with conventional medicines compared to everyday prescription drugs giving patients ADR on a regular basis with fatal consequences. A recently adopted cynically ploy used by drug companies for useless new drugs, are to re-market them and claim there better used as a preventative. So ruthless and greedy are drug companies and all those smarmy executives that support them, that there are not satisfied with giving toxic and harmful drugs to sick people, they now want to give their harmful drugs to healthy people, pretending it's a preventative (Relenza)! 'Tamoxifen' the so-called wonder drug for breast cancer has showed it did not prevent the disease in healthy women, yet it was marketed as a preventative. The marketing men in drug companies and science writers like to create stories of fear by falsely claiming how people are predisposed to the genetic risks of the 'usual suspects' of chronic diseases like heart disease, Parkinson's and Alzheimers etc. The same science writers marvelled at the 'gene therapy' cures in the late 80's and early 90's - so where have all those cures gone ? Drug companies invent diseases like HRT and ADHD for hyper-active children so as to peddle their toxic drugs [in some cultures like in Africa, Japan and China menopause is a natural uneventful phase - not a disease ] The latest bullshizzen to come will be a drug for male menopause too ! Drug companies choose scientists that support their views and the wrong age-groups of people to participate in their clinical trials so as give a false and favourable reports for their new toxic drug. They recruit young healthy adults, like students in their twenties, for drugs aimed at sick elderly people! Prestigious medical journals like the 'New England Journal of Medicine' & 'Journal of the American Medical Association' suck up to pharmaceutical companies in order to increase their advertising revenue. (Brit. Med. Journal. Vol:319 20/11/99) Boots our high-street chemist in 1995 hired a team of private investigators in an attempt to discredit and suppress a survey on cheaper drugs. Drug companies have been caught paying pharmacists for confidential information on patient records. Drug companies send out sycophantic Christmas cards to lonely, elderly patients on their drugs! [ Arthrocare did this in 1998 for people on their drugs for arthritis] Dr. James Bochsler received £22,500 to fabricate medical records for drug trials. In 1996 Dr. Geoffrey Fairhurst from Merseyside was caught receiving payments of £15,000 from Glaxo for secretly testing an unknown drug at his surgery on his unsuspecting patients. Dr. Fairhurst was a Government advisor on health, a former JP, and chairman of a medical ethics committee! The chemical company Inveresk Research in Edinburgh bribed vulnerable students to test out their toxic pesticides. Drug companies are buying up leading herbal manufacturers like Solgar. Bayer, the German drug company were found guilty of bribing 2,500 Portuguese doctors. Schering-Plough, the drug company are being taken to court for falsely advertising the benefits of their latest allergy drug - 'Claritin'. Etc etc etc..How about we see how things develop for SLA, How about we see what Ropren and other Bioeffectives can do rather than just put shiiiiiiit on the company, if products fail or are determined useless so be it but at least give them a go and keep an open mind!!!!!!until evidence to the contrary is produced.

Written on behalf of the Liberal and labor parties, communists and alternatives by EPITANMAN follower of SLA. PS vote me in as an independant director if you want I could use some extra money and I am totally independant. LOL

ALL THE WAY WITH SLA

BIO BIGGY 2007



AGX DON"T BE LATE IN 2008